Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA03208 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:47:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzzxx17524; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:16:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA25284; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:14:13 -0500
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:14:12 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <1064.6597T584T405@mt-inc.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: johnc@mt-inc.com (John Crookshank)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Slow LW 4.0/4.1 for Amiga
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
On 23-Jan-96 16:19:13, Brian Dady (bdady@netcom.com) Emailed:
> I thought the same thing and haven't had any size/speed problems with
> the code generated by SAS C 6.55. The only problem is that SAS no
> longer supports it. Hopefully AT will convince them to resume work on
> it. They were really making great progress after taking the Development
> system over from Lattice.
SAS still provides support, they are just not doing any further development